No common baseline
Leadership and delivery teams use different definitions of AI maturity.
AI maturity assessment and strategy platform
PATHVAI gives leaders and strategic consultants a repeatable way to assess organisational AI maturity, expose the gaps that constrain value, align stakeholders, and prioritise the next decisions with evidence.
Current beta access. No credit card required to begin.
The decision problem
Pilots can prove that a model works. They do not prove that the organisation can govern it, operate it, adopt it, or turn it into sustained value.
PATHVAI examines the connected capabilities behind AI performance so leadership can see where ambition is ahead of readiness.
Leadership and delivery teams use different definitions of AI maturity.
Investment choices follow the loudest opinion or latest vendor rather than evidence.
Activity measures exist, but there is no reliable way to show capability is improving.
The PATHVAI method
Assess, interpret, prioritise, and reassess across seven connected organisational capabilities.
Create the organisation workspace and record the industry, size, and assessment purpose.
Use Lite for rapid discovery or Full for a comprehensive diagnostic.
Answer across seven dimensions with autosave and an accountable assessment creator.
Review maturity, gaps, risks, recommendations, and eligible peer context.
Export the result, create a controlled stakeholder link, and return on a consistent cadence.
PATHVAI structures the evidence. Your leaders and advisors decide what it means in context.
AIMM: AI Maturity Model
AIMM is PATHVAI's seven-dimension organisational AI maturity model. Results use five levels: Exploratory, Foundational, Structured, Integrated, and Transformative.
AI ambition, decision rights, investment priorities, accountability, and oversight.
Leadership, roles, skills, capacity, and operating arrangements for sustainable delivery.
Data, platforms, architecture, access, quality, and technical foundations for reliable AI use.
How use cases are selected, developed, deployed, monitored, maintained, and retired.
Legal, ethical, security, privacy, model, and operational risks and responses.
Outcomes, benefits, adoption, cost, and strategic value connected to AI initiatives.
People, work redesign, trust, adoption, and the practices that make change stick.
The appropriate target depends on strategy, risk, operating context, investment appetite, and intended AI use. AIMM is a decision-support framework. It does not constitute an audit, certification, legal opinion, or guarantee of business performance.
Assessment paths
Lite and Full are two valid entry points into the same seven-dimension model, designed for different moments in the decision cycle.
The 32-question Lite assessment gives leaders and advisors an early view of organisational strengths and priority gaps across all seven AIMM dimensions. It is designed to sharpen the next conversation, not replace a comprehensive diagnostic.
About 15-20 minutes, with autosave and resume.
Start with LiteThe Full assessment uses a deeper adaptive question path to examine capability, risk, operating practice, adoption, and value across the organisation. It provides the strongest PATHVAI basis for detailed recommendations, executive reporting, and eligible peer comparison.
About 45-60 minutes; exact depth varies with the adaptive path.
Choose FullWho PATHVAI supports
For business decision-makers
Establish a shared current-state view, identify the capabilities most likely to constrain value, align investment priorities, and govern progress across repeat assessment cycles.
Create your AI maturity baselineFor strategic consultants
Structure discovery, align client stakeholders, build a strategic narrative, export decision-ready outputs, and return with evidence of progress. Consultants bring context and judgement. PATHVAI brings the repeatable evidence workflow.
Discuss advisory useTrust and traceability
PATHVAI preserves the framework version, scoring configuration, question context, and evidence used for each completed assessment. Role-aware workspaces, controlled sharing, and consent-aware benchmarking support responsible use without pretending that a maturity model replaces judgement.
Questions buyers and advisors ask
PATHVAI is designed for executives, technology and strategy leaders, governance teams, and strategic consultants who need a repeatable way to assess organisational AI capability and turn findings into an accountable improvement plan.
The Lite assessment contains 32 plain-language questions and takes about 15-20 minutes. The Full assessment takes about 45-60 minutes and uses a deeper adaptive question path. Both autosave progress so the creator can pause and resume.
Benchmarks use anonymised results from organisations that have opted in. A matching cohort must contain at least 10 organisations before results are shown. Eligible completed Full assessments can be compared by industry, size, or region where sufficient data exists.
No. PATHVAI structures the evidence, scoring, recommendations, and reporting workflow. Leaders and advisors remain responsible for interpretation, organisation-specific context, professional judgement, and final decisions.
Features, limits, and availability may change as PATHVAI validates the product. Occasional interruptions may occur, and beta access has no service-level agreement. No credit card is required for the current beta experience.
Current beta
Use Lite for a rapid baseline and sharper discovery. Use Full when leadership needs comprehensive evidence, detailed recommendations, and the strongest basis for an AI roadmap.
No credit card is required to begin the current beta experience. Features, limits, and availability may change while commercial packaging is validated.